Trump's election win isn't all doom and gloom for sustainable investing website triangle v2

Trump isn’t all doom and gloom for sustainable investing

Joe Mares

Joe Mares

Portfolio Manager

Joe Mares

Joe Mares

Portfolio Manager
Joe Mares has worked in investment banking, equity research, and portfolio management in high carbon-emitting sectors (energy/utilities/materials) for over 27 years. Joe began his career at Morgan Stanley in 1997 in investment banking and equity research in Energy & Shipping. In 2007, Joe moved to the buy side, as lead Equity & Commodities Analyst for Greg Coffey, at GLG and then Moore Capital, from 2009. Prior to joining Trium, Joe was a Portfolio Manager at Société Générale from 2011-2016, responsible for a global long/short equity book focused on Energy, Resources, Shipping, and Utilities. Joe holds a Bachelor’s degree from the School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University.
Trium Climate Impact
Trium ESG Emissions Improvers
Trium Climate Impact
Trium ESG Emissions Improvers

Latest Insights

Watch Videos

Tom Ayres

Tom Ayres

Portfolio Manager

Tom Ayres

Tom Ayres

Portfolio Manager
Tom is an ex-GAM and BlueCrest Portfolio Manager, leveraging his fundamental and quantitative analysis skills to generate returns for clients. Tom graduated from Oxford University with an M.Eng in in 2001, specialising in civil engineering. He then joined Lehman Brothers in Hong Kong as an Analyst within the Equity Capital Markets team before moving to boutique Anglo Chinese Corporate Finance to focus on IPOs and M&A. Seeking a transition to the buy-side, he gained an M.Sc with distinction in Finance from Imperial College in London, and joined GAM, initially as an analyst. Tom is a CFA Charter holder.

Share on

The election of Donald Trump marks another bend on the winding route of global decarbonisation. Despite possible changes in regulations and government support in the USA, we believe companies providing more efficient, lower cost green solutions to basic human needs such as housing, transportation, food, energy, infrastructure, and sanitation will succeed, whether in the United States or globally.

We believe that environmental investing should be based on understanding an individual company’s products, customers, and valuation, rather than a purely top-down perspective. The election of Donald Trump and Republican majorities is a step back for environmental regulations. Still, there are significant investing opportunities in 2025, most of which have become more attractive since last year and are not directly reliant on USA decarbonisation policies.

The Inflation Reduction Act

Over the next year, we believe there will be modifications to US environmental policies, including changes to the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). As the largest environmentally focused investment policy in US history, the bill’s scope includes spending on clean electricity, electric vehicles, sustainable fuels, conservation, domestic manufacturing, and building efficiency, among other areas. The IRA also extended Investment Tax Credits (ITC) and Production Tax Credits (PTC) for solar, storage, and wind until 2032. It is estimated that total government spending on projects under the IRA will be roughly $800 billion(1), higher than the initial $375 billion estimate. The spending authorisation is uncapped and has been difficult to forecast as it depends on private sector involvement and consumer behaviour.

We believe the consumer elements of the IRA, such as incentives for the purchase of EVs and heat pumps, are most at risk, along with offshore wind developments. Conversely, the least at-risk elements are tax credits to build nuclear, hydrogen, and carbon capture. It is possible that renewables and domestic content tax credits (e.g., wind and solar) could be modified. Republicans want to extend the previous Trump tax cuts, and possibly lower taxes even further. Modifying the IRA is a relatively straightforward way to offset those cuts, but we believe the near-term funding will likely continue.

Most of the IRA funding has gone to Republican congressional districts, providing a natural hedge against significant changes. We believe the most likely outcome is some form of time limit on IRA incentives, allowing Trump to claim “savings” while avoiding a significant slowdown in economic activity in the near term. This change would bring environmental regulation back to its pre-2022 position, where renewables incentives had a short time frame creating a stop-start phasing of developments as the ITC/PTC was periodically renewed. We also anticipate more linkage between ITC/PTC and domestic content requirements.

Looking back to look forward

In addition to the IRA, we expect a Trump presidency to affect environmental policy more generally via government appointments. The introduction of more conservative officials at the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Interior, Department of Treasury, and Department of Energy, is likely to influence environmental policy and regulation during Trump’s time in office. We expect more conservative Supreme and Federal court judges that will be approved by a Republican Senate. Trump also plans to increase tariffs on imported goods, which will increase the costs of renewables development and favour domestic manufacturing.

We have had limited positioning in renewables, clean tech companies, and electric vehicle companies, in anticipation of this risk. At this stage, significant regulatory change has been priced in these stocks, and we anticipate buying opportunities through 2025 as actual changes are implemented. We believe that companies with US manufacturing will retain a competitive advantage under Trump.

It is important to consider that the ICLN Clean Energy Index rallied 400% from Trump’s inauguration in January 2017 to Biden’s inauguration in January 2021, but then fell by 50% in the last four years. The stock market looks ahead and typically anticipates political and regulatory change. Renewables stocks fell throughout 2022-2024 despite the “game-changing” Inflation Reduction Act designed to encourage renewables and Democratic polling strength throughout most of this period. One could argue that low fossil fuel prices and low interest rates from 2016 to 2020 drove capital into renewables versus fossil fuels, while higher energy prices and high interest rates have discouraged decarbonisation relative to fossil fuel investment in the last three years, as affordability was challenged.

While Trump now has a “Red Sweep,” history would suggest that the Republicans will be challenged to hold the House of Representatives in 2026. Of the 13 mid-term elections since 1968, the incumbent party lost seats in the House of Representatives 11 times, with an average change of 24 seats across all mid-terms. Even recognizing that re-districting has reduced the number of competitive districts, the current projected Republican advantage of seven seats may come under pressure in two years.

The Investment Case

From an investing perspective, the structural themes of electrification, green buildings, transition metals, and waste and water infrastructure growth will continue despite political changes, as they have broad-based societal and economic drivers. These themes are occurring globally, in the UK, the EU, the USA, Japan, and emerging markets.

We believe that renewables demand will continue to grow due to its cost advantages and scalability, even without direct government support. Baseload electricity demand is now increasing in both developed and emerging markets, driven by the energy transition, data centres, and growing air conditioning use. This growth in electricity demand will drive increasing renewables and storage deployment, which is the fastest pathway to add electricity supply. Hyperscalers buying power for data centres are capable of paying higher prices to compensate for lower government support.

We believe that the underperformance of environmentally focused stocks over the last three years will end in 2025. A global universe of 850 companies with environmental revenues is forecast to have higher earnings growth than MSCI ACWI in 2024-2026, with lower valuation multiples. This was not true in 2021-2024 as investors were paying a sustainability premium that has now receded, while the revenue growth has continued.

In high-emitting industries such as shipping, steel, mining, cement, airlines, and chemicals, we are focused on companies and projects that can decarbonise based on company-specific advantages. We believe policies such as the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and USA tariffs will place emphasis on supporting local manufacturing, with accompanying increases in prices for these products. Regulated carbon markets in both the EU and USA are expected to tighten beyond 2026 due to lower free allocations, incorporating more industrial and transportation activities, and rising electricity demand requiring gas peak load generation.

We believe that dispersion will remain significant across the high-emitting and environmental sectors, and companies with advantaged products, output growth, and emissions reductions should outperform their sector peers over time.


_____________


(1) Multiple groups have forecast the IRA’s fiscal costs over its 10-year life. In November 2022, Credit Suisse forecast that the IRA’s fiscal cost to the federal budget would amount to more than $800 billion over 10 years.  In March of 2023, researchers at the Brookings Institution estimated the IRA fiscal cost to be $780 billion through 2031.  That same month, Goldman Sachs forecast the IRA fiscal cost at $1.2 trillion. And in April, University of Pennsylvania researchers expected the IRA fiscal cost to be just over $1 trillion from 2023 to 2032. In addition, CBO recently increased its projected fiscal costs of energy related tax provisions, making their forecast roughly in line with these outside projections.

RELATED INSIGHTS

SIGN UP TO TRIUM TALKS
Trium Talks triangle